2023.20.2- 2023.24.2
Today I work to prepare to write the essay.
(I find and see some video and essay today.)
And finished the Graduate+ semester.
And I analyze the essay which writes an artist. I want to study the structure. Because I will write two similar essays. So I want to study an essay.
Intro:
Pearls have long been a popular material for designers, particularly in jewelry and related fields. This article compares the differences between two modern artists who use pearls be the main element. The similarities and differences between the two women, who use the same materials but in different styles, are shown separately. Whereas Mizuki Goltz’s style is more traditional, Polina Osipova’s is more avant-garde. Mizuki Goltz is a famous artist and designer. She knows pearls very well and especially knows how to match them. In her work, the pearls show fluidity and harmony. According to the words of Vogue ‘Goltz is known for her unusual pairings. (Pearls and leather, she’s discovered, make excellent bedfellows)’ If you open the website of the brand she has opened, you will also find a large number of soft, adjustable pearl necklaces, earrings, and other pieces. Unlike modern, fluid designs, the style of Polina Osipova, who is more of an avant-garde artist, has instead incorporated several ethnic features. She often creates mysteriously large decorative objects. The eye is a common source for her creations. The pearl is often used as a border for the eye and as a mass of tears dangling from beneath it. Just in 2022, Vogue described her work this way ‘she wears a headdress shaped like a large thimble that is beaded and covered in metal coins. These pieces reference Osipova’s Chuvash roots, an ancient Turkic ethnicity that lives within Russia’s borders and parts of Estonia.’ This ethnic style thus makes for an uncanny collision between her work and pearls, a material that excels at building up a sense of complexity.(Vogue. 2022) Both designers are very good at working with pearls. This paper will be based on the work of both men, their creative philosophy, and external evaluation. The three points of comparison are material, technique, and expressiveness.
